<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for michaelw.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.michaelw.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.michaelw.net</link>
	<description>Random thoughts from michaelw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:19:06 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Good luck finding good content by Khrob</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/12/good-luck-finding-good-content/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Khrob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=253#comment-141</guid>
		<description>so we need something that googles google now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so we need something that googles google now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do something useful by Khrob</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/12/do-something-useful/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Khrob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 10:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=251#comment-133</guid>
		<description>I hear you.  I&#039;m contemplating logging absolutely everything I do over a few days to try and locate areas that would benefit from software assistance.

The question I&#039;m trying to ask myself whenever I develop something these days is &quot;who is my first customer going to be?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you.  I&#8217;m contemplating logging absolutely everything I do over a few days to try and locate areas that would benefit from software assistance.</p>
<p>The question I&#8217;m trying to ask myself whenever I develop something these days is &#8220;who is my first customer going to be?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Of hammers and nails by Sid Probstein</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/06/of-hammers-and-nails/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Sid Probstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 21:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=207#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Great post. I agree that faceted browse is popular, and that buying such capabilities makes sense for the majority of buyers. However it&#039;s also important to look under the hood. Manually selecting the facets for a particular category of searches is typical (and can be time consuming.) 

At Attivio, we&#039;ve gone one step further: our product, the Active Intelligence Engine (AIE) has a feature called Facet Finder that analyzes each result set on-the-fly and automatically identifies the best facets for that search.  (No pre-computing or manual configuration required.)

I also agree with your sentiment about the relational database: it is definitely time for something new!  AIE can index structured (i.e. relational) and unstructured data and has a query-side JOIN() search operator that allows you to use relationships (as a database does) and combine that with full-text operations. 

Visit our website if you&#039;d like to learn more...  thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. I agree that faceted browse is popular, and that buying such capabilities makes sense for the majority of buyers. However it&#8217;s also important to look under the hood. Manually selecting the facets for a particular category of searches is typical (and can be time consuming.) </p>
<p>At Attivio, we&#8217;ve gone one step further: our product, the Active Intelligence Engine (AIE) has a feature called Facet Finder that analyzes each result set on-the-fly and automatically identifies the best facets for that search.  (No pre-computing or manual configuration required.)</p>
<p>I also agree with your sentiment about the relational database: it is definitely time for something new!  AIE can index structured (i.e. relational) and unstructured data and has a query-side JOIN() search operator that allows you to use relationships (as a database does) and combine that with full-text operations. </p>
<p>Visit our website if you&#8217;d like to learn more&#8230;  thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Of hammers and nails by Daniel Tunkelang</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/06/of-hammers-and-nails/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Tunkelang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 13:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=207#comment-74</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fox.com/kingofthehill/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;King of the hill&lt;/a&gt;, eh? I&#039;ll take it. :-)

For those interested in learning more about faceted search at a modest price, I encourage you to check out my recently published &lt;a href=&quot;http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/06/02/faceted-search-book-now-available-online/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;book&lt;/a&gt; on the subject.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fox.com/kingofthehill/" rel="nofollow">King of the hill</a>, eh? I&#8217;ll take it. <img src='http://www.michaelw.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>For those interested in learning more about faceted search at a modest price, I encourage you to check out my recently published <a href="http://thenoisychannel.com/2009/06/02/faceted-search-book-now-available-online/" rel="nofollow">book</a> on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Awkward photos by Tim Hollingsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/05/awkward-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hollingsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 16:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=204#comment-66</guid>
		<description>Oh my god... that walrus is magnificent</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my god&#8230; that walrus is magnificent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lollypop by Tim Hollingsworth</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/05/lollypop/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hollingsworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 15:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=200#comment-62</guid>
		<description>I agree it is a nice vid.  Check this one out: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77Ub4Aat9kY&amp;fmt=18.  It&#039;s very clever and also a great song, and written by a contemporary band which is good to see.

YouTube has signed deals with various record labels.  It looks like the Sony agreement would cover Courtney&#039;s video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree it is a nice vid.  Check this one out: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77Ub4Aat9kY&amp;fmt=18" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77Ub4Aat9kY&amp;fmt=18</a>.  It&#8217;s very clever and also a great song, and written by a contemporary band which is good to see.</p>
<p>YouTube has signed deals with various record labels.  It looks like the Sony agreement would cover Courtney&#8217;s video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Dangerous at any size by Peyman</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/04/dangerous-at-any-size/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Peyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 17:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=148#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I like URL shorteners for one simple reason: they provide value. 

One, some apps do a terrible job with long urls. Ever get an email with an url that&#039;s been cut up across multiple lines and you have to perform minor surgery on it before you can open it? Yes, there&#039;s a bug somewhere in the message chain, but that&#039;s reality.

Two, analytics. Ever want to know how many people click thru the link you sent in email, post twitter or facebook, ...? An URL shortener can tell you (bit.ly and other do). Not a terrible way to measure your influence and raise your ad rates.

Three, central point of failure is concern, but (a) that&#039;s easy to overcome by publishing your mapping so others can mirror it, and (b) URL shorteners can actually reduce failure by archiving the page they point to. That helps with link rot.

Four, you other concerns you mention are valid, though I could just as easily argue that URL shorteners can help with those things. Imagine an URL shortener that verifies the target url to make sure that there is no SPAM, malware, etc. Similarly, imagine an URL shortener that verifies the target url for inappropriate content (whatever that may be) that increases trust instead of diminishing it.

Any how, I can imagine all sorts of other interesting services that you could integrate into an URL shortener. I love that folks are experimenting. Let a thousand flowers bloom. Let&#039;s see how much value we can squeeze out of this. If there&#039;s enough aggregate value, I&#039;m sure there will be a bunch of consolidation, and then a Google or Microsoft will notice and buy one. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like URL shorteners for one simple reason: they provide value. </p>
<p>One, some apps do a terrible job with long urls. Ever get an email with an url that&#8217;s been cut up across multiple lines and you have to perform minor surgery on it before you can open it? Yes, there&#8217;s a bug somewhere in the message chain, but that&#8217;s reality.</p>
<p>Two, analytics. Ever want to know how many people click thru the link you sent in email, post twitter or facebook, &#8230;? An URL shortener can tell you (bit.ly and other do). Not a terrible way to measure your influence and raise your ad rates.</p>
<p>Three, central point of failure is concern, but (a) that&#8217;s easy to overcome by publishing your mapping so others can mirror it, and (b) URL shorteners can actually reduce failure by archiving the page they point to. That helps with link rot.</p>
<p>Four, you other concerns you mention are valid, though I could just as easily argue that URL shorteners can help with those things. Imagine an URL shortener that verifies the target url to make sure that there is no SPAM, malware, etc. Similarly, imagine an URL shortener that verifies the target url for inappropriate content (whatever that may be) that increases trust instead of diminishing it.</p>
<p>Any how, I can imagine all sorts of other interesting services that you could integrate into an URL shortener. I love that folks are experimenting. Let a thousand flowers bloom. Let&#8217;s see how much value we can squeeze out of this. If there&#8217;s enough aggregate value, I&#8217;m sure there will be a bunch of consolidation, and then a Google or Microsoft will notice and buy one. <img src='http://www.michaelw.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Art &amp; Science of Seductive Interactions: So Right and Yet So Wrong by michaelw</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/04/the-art-science-of-seductive-interactions-so-right-and-yet-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>michaelw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 06:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=145#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Thank you Stephen for the thoughtful response.  My own response did not suffer from brevity and got a post of its own: Anderson&#039;s Law http://www.michaelw.net/2009/04/andersons-law/

I&#039;ve posted this in both our comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Stephen for the thoughtful response.  My own response did not suffer from brevity and got a post of its own: Anderson&#8217;s Law <a href="http://www.michaelw.net/2009/04/andersons-law/" rel="nofollow">http://www.michaelw.net/2009/04/andersons-law/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve posted this in both our comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Art &amp; Science of Seductive Interactions: So Right and Yet So Wrong by Stephen P. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/04/the-art-science-of-seductive-interactions-so-right-and-yet-so-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen P. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=145#comment-27</guid>
		<description>(Hi Michael - I&#039;m posting my response here and on my site!)

Could you suggest some &quot;real applications&quot; for me?  I&#039;d love to test these ideas out in a really challenging context!

On that note, I&#039;ve been asked about whether these kinds of ideas would work inside an enterprise with something like accounting software or time sheets. My general answer is an emphatic &quot;Yes!&quot; What I&#039;m discussing are essentially human behaviors. I believe if there is a human involved involved in the interaction, then these kinds of things would work (to different degrees or altered for context, of course!). 

As far as the perception that these are slick marketing techniques-- yes and no. I&#039;m a designer at heart, meaning I [heart] designing good experiences that are meaningful, useful, enjoyable, etc. (more here: http://www.poetpainter.com/thoughts/article/classifying-experiences ). I strongly oppose anything that smells of a bait and switch! In fact, when I use the &quot;getting to first base&quot; analogy, the end goal isn&#039;t a home run (&quot;Close the deal!&quot;), the end goal is lasting love and devotion-- which only happens with product/service experiences that deliver the goods day after day! The unfortunate part of this is that you can have a truly great product that no one will sit down to truly understand before they make up their mind. People in general are hit with too much noise all the time. I don&#039;t think of the ideas I&#039;m discussing as slick marketing-- I think of this as optimizing for human behaviors. If we know our product is really, really good, but we&#039;re having trouble communicating that-- these ideas are intended to help good product designers/developers ease users into using a new product. When I talk about business goals, I talk about value centered design ( http://www.bplusd.org/2005/10/08/value-centered-design/ which is about business AND user value. I&#039;m fond of quoting Peter Drucker who said &quot;there is no business without customers.&quot; 

You can have the most valuable product in the world, but if no one sticks around long enough to realize that-- what do you do next? Just offering something of use to someone and gradually revealing features isn&#039;t enough given what we know about attention and decision making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Hi Michael &#8211; I&#8217;m posting my response here and on my site!)</p>
<p>Could you suggest some &#8220;real applications&#8221; for me?  I&#8217;d love to test these ideas out in a really challenging context!</p>
<p>On that note, I&#8217;ve been asked about whether these kinds of ideas would work inside an enterprise with something like accounting software or time sheets. My general answer is an emphatic &#8220;Yes!&#8221; What I&#8217;m discussing are essentially human behaviors. I believe if there is a human involved involved in the interaction, then these kinds of things would work (to different degrees or altered for context, of course!). </p>
<p>As far as the perception that these are slick marketing techniques&#8211; yes and no. I&#8217;m a designer at heart, meaning I [heart] designing good experiences that are meaningful, useful, enjoyable, etc. (more here: <a href="http://www.poetpainter.com/thoughts/article/classifying-experiences" rel="nofollow">http://www.poetpainter.com/thoughts/article/classifying-experiences</a> ). I strongly oppose anything that smells of a bait and switch! In fact, when I use the &#8220;getting to first base&#8221; analogy, the end goal isn&#8217;t a home run (&#8220;Close the deal!&#8221;), the end goal is lasting love and devotion&#8211; which only happens with product/service experiences that deliver the goods day after day! The unfortunate part of this is that you can have a truly great product that no one will sit down to truly understand before they make up their mind. People in general are hit with too much noise all the time. I don&#8217;t think of the ideas I&#8217;m discussing as slick marketing&#8211; I think of this as optimizing for human behaviors. If we know our product is really, really good, but we&#8217;re having trouble communicating that&#8211; these ideas are intended to help good product designers/developers ease users into using a new product. When I talk about business goals, I talk about value centered design ( <a href="http://www.bplusd.org/2005/10/08/value-centered-design/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bplusd.org/2005/10/08/value-centered-design/</a> which is about business AND user value. I&#8217;m fond of quoting Peter Drucker who said &#8220;there is no business without customers.&#8221; </p>
<p>You can have the most valuable product in the world, but if no one sticks around long enough to realize that&#8211; what do you do next? Just offering something of use to someone and gradually revealing features isn&#8217;t enough given what we know about attention and decision making.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Undertipping by Dana</title>
		<link>http://www.michaelw.net/2009/04/undertipping/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 02:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michaelw.net/?p=130#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tipped zero once, for misserably bad service. I did however also write a note on my bill listing everything that I thought was not up to snuff. I felt a little bad with the zero tip, but figured it would send a clear message to my waiter that he should really pay attention to the customer next time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tipped zero once, for misserably bad service. I did however also write a note on my bill listing everything that I thought was not up to snuff. I felt a little bad with the zero tip, but figured it would send a clear message to my waiter that he should really pay attention to the customer next time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
